By Patty Swing
Maxine
Hong Kingston and Sandra Cisneros are both writers who have written about their
immigrant experience in the United States, however they differ in how their
narrator views what they went through. Hong Kingston seems to have held a lot
of bitterness and resentment towards her situation while Cisneros’ narrator
presented a gradual loss of innocence. This can be seen in their difference in
narration style.
The
anger in the child’s voice resonates in the way Hong Kingston uses imagery,
specifically when she is recalling tormenting the girl who seemed to be a
reflection of everything she hated most about herself. “I hated… I hated… I
hated… I hated her,” she had repeated (68). She criticizes every detail that
connects back to her culture—the younger sister’s haircut, her struggle with
speaking, and the way she seemed to embody their Chinese heritage. However, the
manner in which she speaks to the younger sister sounds more like she is
talking to herself. Hong Kingston separates herself in the text, trying to
become more like her Mexican and black friends and mimicking how they acted. She
even tries to hide the features that are associated with being Chinese and
through most of the text, it seems as if she wished she was never Chinese. By
the end of it the excerpt, though, it is revealed that it was not that she
hated who she was, but that she hated how unprotected she felt. Because unlike
the younger sister, there was no one there to protect her from the “strangers,
ghosts, [and] boys” (73).
Cisneros, on the other hand, uses the stream of
consciousness that projects the naivety of Esperanza, the main character. Her
thoughts are brief and are simple reiterations of what she is experiencing, and
the implications of the events seem to go right over her head, even though it
seems clear enough to the audience. In one of the excerpts, “My Name”, the two
sisters take advantage of her desire to make friends. “If you give me five
dollars I will be your friend forever. That’s what the little one tells me”
(80). To her, there is nothing wrong with the proposal; it is reasonable and
even cheap. However, the audience knows that they are using her. This naivety
and ignorance is also present in “Those Who Don’t” because she notices the way
other people behave in the neighborhood where she grows up as opposed to the
way her and her family behave when they visit another neighborhood that is
unlike theirs. “Those who don’t know any better come into our neighborhood
scared… But watch us drive into a neighborhood of another color and our knees
go shakity-shake and our car windows get rolled up tight and our eyes look
straight” (82). There is an implication that she wants know the reason for that,
but then she finishes off with, “Yeah. That is how it goes and goes,” which
expresses a confused resignation that she might have to just accept the fact
without ever knowing why. Much of what Esperanza witnesses is given the same
response because it is like no one seems to want to tell her what is going on.
She is being kept in the dark, blindly scrambling for the pieces to a puzzle
that everyone around her has already put together and accepted. This slowly
makes her resentful of her upbringing and the way things are—the fear, the unfairness,
and the reality of it all.
Both writers’ narratives hold a resentment that stirs
bitter feelings toward their different upbringings. This creates an environment
where they feel the need to make weapons of their own--a different image for
Hong Kingston, a different name for Cisneros—to protect themselves because no
one in their family would give them that protection.
Word
Count: 634
I think for your analysis on Kingston's piece, adding a little more about the last point that she felt "unprotected" would really make a strong conclusion for that part of the post. I was left wanting to know more about why you said that and some more evidence being tied into that statement. Ovearll, you had a good argument that both narrators illustrated resentment in their characters on the topic of how they were raised in a foreign land.
ReplyDeleteI found it very interesting that you analyzed the resentment that the characters felt and how that was possible a result of feeling vulnerable to other people. It would be nice if it was evenly split between explaining what they felt and why they felt that way. Your thesis does stray a bit when you talk about Cisneros because you mentioned that it would be about a loss of innocence in the intro but the last paragraph seemed more about resentment. Your analysis brought up interesting points ( the resentment) that I did not really notice as a reader.
ReplyDelete