Blog Post #1
When discussing “Before the Law”
by Franz Kafka, my group had different opinions on which literary theory fit
best with this short story. We decided that the Marxist theory encompassed all
aspects of exposing the inequalities and the imbalance of power that occurs amongst
the countryman and the gatekeeper. The main struggle that the countryman faces
is getting access to enter the gate, in which I think the gate represents the
law. Kafka stated “…the law should always be accessible for everyone…” which
seems to be a common Marxist idea. Though the law states it is accessible to
everyone, it is shown that it is only accessible to the people who can afford
it and belong to a high social class, shown by denying the countryman entrance.
The story continuously shows the imbalance of power between the countryman and
the gatekeeper which illustrates a sort of ladder as if the gatekeeper is on
top, “…But take note: I am powerful’”. The gatekeeper is looking down on the
countryman who is struggling to climb the ladder. By having the title of
“gatekeeper” I think it gives him an unspoken power. This makes it harder for
the countryman to communicate with the gatekeeper because the gatekeeper has a
mindset that he is better than the countryman. Another idea that my group came
up with is the powerless victims from the Marxism theory. Though the gatekeeper
accepts all the countryman’s possessions, he is still not allowed past the
gate, further proving that as a countryman, he holds no power or ability to get
past the law, “the man, who has equipped himself with many things for his
journey, spends everything, no matter how valuable…but, as he does so, says, ‘I
am taking this only so that you don’t think you have failed to do anything.’”.
it is clear that the countryman has given what seems like his all into getting
past the gate, but is still unable to do so.
A different approach is the
psychological theory. One way of looking at this is that the gates could represent
“God”. In a sense that we all have different fates and paths and at the end of
our journeys we enter the “gates” into heaven. This doesn’t fit the Marxist
approach because the higher power does not intend for people to have
inequalities of power nor does it intend for people of lower social classes to
be banned from entering the gates. Another
way this theory incorporates itself is that the gates could be looked at as subconscious
barriers to the countryman’s success—he is the only one that can unlock the
gate. These thoughts are personal to his fears which are keeping him out of the
gate, “…he decides it would be better to wait until he gets permission to go
inside”. The countryman’s’ own conscious is denying him access to enter the
gates because he is, instead, looking for permission that he will never receive.
While the psychological theory
shows comprehensive evidence of how it could perfectly fit the short story, I
believe that the story is better achieved through the Marxist theory. There is more
symbolism shown about the inequalities and the imbalance of power that affect
the countryman and his inabilities to get past the gate rather than the
psychological mindset blocking his path.
Word Count: 554
I really like how you incorporated the quotes into your blog post and how you make sense of the underlinings within the story. I think that the first paragraph is put really well together but I also think that the length of the paragraph compared to the others can be adjusted. I believe that the second example that your provide for arguing the Marxist theory can be separated and made into its own paragraph, that way it makes the paragraphs seem more equal. Overall, I really appreciate your writing and how you made me think more out of the box with your analysis of the story.
ReplyDelete